CC: Goal – conclude the generic version of the ratings model
EK: Status of content in GitHub (old) – hard for EK to get to the point of agreement until see can see the OWL. Update the OWL to the ratings fork to compare with what is in FIBO core (to see where they differ). Some of the dependencies are critical.
EK: Some of the tags (i.e. rating performer) are being questioned by FIBO ontologists. Rating Performer has been changed to “rating party.”
CC: EK also to look at the “assessments” ontology – some changes have been proposed (impact “opinion” and “set of dates”). Action: CC to raise JIRA issues (for alignment with FND) and edit the branch
EK: Loans also needs to reference the ratings ontology
PR: Examples of OWL individuals (how ratings is using the classes and properties) is desired. Action: CC to create a complete instance specification
EK: The ratings ontology will reside in FND and link to FBC for dependency coordination
CC: Action: communicate to CC any OWL changes (not just fix) to align adjustments
CC: We can now consider the current generic model complete (pending OWL adjustments)
CC: spreadsheet of definitions has been posted to the Wiki for review
EK: Some of the definitions don’t correspond to the ISO standard. EK is fixing as found
CC: Proposing “credit ratings” as the next area for ratings ontology work (starting next week)
Decisions:
Action items
Cory Casanave Raise JIRA Issues for Assessment Ontology adjustments
Cory Casanave Edit Ratings branch in Github for EK review