Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

The following table identifies ontologies to be reviewed for proper and consistent use of values.

Value Class or  property

 

Change

 

Hits

 

Reason

 

Business Facing Types

 

Deprecate
  – review current usage

156 / 15

 

Not well  supported by OWL, insufficient net value

fibo-fnd-arr-id;Identifier

 

fibo-fnd-arr-id;TextIdentifier (Subclass of AtomicValue)

 

22/16


 

Current  IDs assume a text property, create this class to capture that assumption.

 

fibo-fnd-arr-id;Identifier 

Subclass  of Value

 

 

Allows  for non-text ID. Issue:FND-91

 

fibo-fnd-dt-bd

 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values


 

27/2


 
 

fibo-fnd-dt-fd

 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values

 

456 / 61 


 

fibo-fnd-plc-adr;Address 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values 

10/5 

 

fibo-fnd-qt-qtu;hasNumericValue 

Subproperty  of hasValue or rename to hasValue


 

7/5

 

Choice

 

fibo-fnd-qt-qtu;QuantityValue 

Subclass  of AtomicValue

 

18/5+


 
 

fibo-fnd-rel-rel;hasUniqueIdentifier

 

Subproperty  of hasValue


 

8/5

 

Note Used in  individuals 

Choice:  Just rename to hasValue?


 

xmlns:fibo-fnd-math-math

 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values

 

287 / 22


 
 

fibo-md-temx-tem 

Review  for subclasses and proper use of values

 

56 / 14

 
 

Other Choices


·        To fold “Value” and “AtomicValue” into one class with an optional “hasValue” property.


·        Further review of ontologies using BFT


  • No labels