Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Date

Attendees

Agenda

1) Use Case reminder

2) Where we are on our road map. 

3) Open Action Items

4) JIRA Issues Review - https://jira.edmcouncil.org/projects/FBC/issues/FBC-106?filter=allopenissues

5) Todays content discussion.

SMIF OWL-UML

SKOS

RDF/S

6) For next week.

Proceedings:

20171006 FIBO FBC

Review of IRS trade field mapping in light of recent work.  Tough issues remain: not clear where they should fall in FIBO. Not clear if there is a home in place for many.  Much of the swap stuff and financial instruments stuff is pretty solid. There are a few gaps, but nothing insurmountable.

 Two big issues: Financial Product (belongs in FBC).

CFTC uses the concept of product in a number of places, but this needs to be unwound.   Unique Product Identifier is relatively fine, but modeling a product and its relationship to and instrument(s). EK is familiar with Nordea view, but this might be idiosyncratic, hence request for input.  David: would need to check with internal SMEs and we should cross-reference UPI spec (such as it is).

https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD580.pdf

Second: look lines 27-29 and 32-34 in CFTC spreadsheet. These are not modeled yet. Need input.  lines 32-35: confirmation that these apply only to derivatives by Jeff Braswell.   lines 27-29: Can apply to any trade.

Jeff B per the regulatory developments that require central clearing of OTC derivatives lines 40-42: seem swap specific, though some of it may be generalizable--successor trade, for example.  Reporting remains an open issue: who can submit and who is a counterparty seems to differ in some cases, hence the granularity of the CFTC categories. The reported events would be driven by operational events that need to be reported (circular reference ? :)

https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD557.pdf

Decisions:

Action items

  •